Skip to content
MRD Watch

Sunday, November 15, 2026

Subscribe
Sponsor this briefing. One site and newsletter slot, $250/week.

Independent briefing

Molecular residual disease across cancers, one sourced line at a time.

A daily briefing of sourced, fact-only updates on molecular residual disease, ctDNA, and MRD-relevant biomarkers across cancer types. Edited by Alan Tan, a genitourinary hematologist-oncologist. MRD and biomarker items are listed ahead of other news from the same stretch of days.

A free weekly MRD Watch email. No send date is set. Subscribe

Edited by Alan Tan, MD
How a minimal residual disease test worksA tumor sheds DNA fragments into a blood draw and a urine sample. Sequencing finds those tumor fragments among normal DNA. After treatment, the result can read ctDNA detected or not detected.Tumor sheds DNABlood drawUrine sampleTumor DNA stands outTumorNormalAfter treatmentctDNA detectedNot detected

How it works

A clear scan can still miss what is left

Drawn scanNo evidence of diseaseCells a scan does not show
The drawing starts as a clear scan labeled no evidence of disease, then shows small marks for residual cells.

“No evidence of disease” means the scan did not show a tumor. Alan Tan, MD, puts the gap this way, as an illustration rather than a cutoff: “To the human eye, a clear scan can still hide around 200 million cancer cells.” MRD testing, especially ultrasensitive MRD, looks for that leftover signal in blood.

How testing works

Today

Nov 15, 2026 ET

No update is dated today. The latest verified items are below, with MRD and biomarker reports ranked first.

Leading updates

Pinned items, then MRD and biomarker reports, then newer dates.

Recent

Ultra-sensitive MRD assessment in long-term complete responders to anti-HER2 therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: initial results from HER2-CR study

Initial results from the prospective HER2-CR registry (NCT06663787) in 37 evaluable patients with long-term CR/PR on anti-HER2 therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer found that 129 of 142 plasma samples (91%) were negative on Signatera Genome and 30 of 37 patients (81%) were negative at every assessment; all 23 patients without radiographic residual disease remained ctDNA-negative, while persistent positivity was more often accompanied by progression.

ESMO Open

Tissue-free ctDNA detection during TNBC surveillance was prognostic, with lead time similar to a tumor-informed assay

A JAMA Oncology analysis published online August 13, 2026, of 1,026 plasma samples from 159 patients in the c-TRAK TN surveillance cohort found that tissue-free ctDNA detection was associated with recurrence (HR 27.2; 95% CI 13.7 to 54.2), and median lead time to recurrence was 7.6 months with the tissue-free assay versus 7.1 months with a multivariant tumor-informed assay.

JAMA Oncology